See Improving DuckDuckGo for more.ĭDG’s next calls are related to HTTPS Upgrades, 21 URLs which should temporarily be exempted from tracker-blocking (likely for compatibility), and lastly a set of “surrogates” which can be injected into the context of a page to prevent breakage whilst blocking trackers.įinally, at the end of this brief survey, I typed “brave” into the address bar to see if keystrokes were sent out. This request relates to DDG’s anonymous a/b testing. The server responds with a transparent GIF. DDG informs the server that I am on a tablet, and that I am using version 7.42.0.1 of the browser. Next, DDG calls /t/m_o_ios_tablet, which appears to collect anonymous usage information, similar to Brave. Much of the file contains meta-information (such as user-friendly names and categories) for various known tracker entities. DDG issues its first request to /trackerblocking/v2/tds.json, which loads information used in DDG’s default tracker-blocking behavior. On its first launch, DDG issued 13 requests, all of which were to the DDG domain. The user is, however, invited to enable such a feature should they choose to do so.ĭuckDuckGo (DDG) and Brave align well on security and privacy principles, so it is no surprise that this browser also scores very well on this type of review. This was not the case with Brave address-bar input does not result in any sort of lookup or auto-complete query. Once the browser was launched, I typed “brave” into the address bar to see if any keystrokes were unexpectedly being sent out in real-time. This request carries with it only a few pieces of non-identifying information: channel, version number, the week of installation, and a set of booleans indicating whether this is an initial, daily, weekly, or monthly run. The final request made by Brave during its first-run is to /1/usage/ios for the purpose of anonymously measuring daily and monthly active user numbers. Browsers which don’t intend to present blocking-statistics need only to load a single blocking list. The JSON list is used for ad-blocking functionality, whereas the Rust list is used for recording blocking-statistics (displayed on the new tab page). The server responded with 524 bytes of JSON containing the current New Tab Page (NTP) sponsor, web addresses for a logo and 3 background images, the sponsor URL, and coordinates for the focal point of each background image.īrave then proceeds to download JSON and Rust versions of its internal ad-block list from adblock-data.s3./iOS13/. The first request issued was to mobile-data.s3./US/photo.json, retrieving information regarding Sponsored Images. Safari is also briefly examined, but not to the extent of the other browsers, due to certain limitations.ĭuring its first run, Brave 1.15 on iOS issued 8 requests exclusively to Brave domains. Today I decided to take a look at various browsers available on iOS 13-specifically, Brave 1.15, DuckDuckGo 7.42.0.1, Mozilla Firefox 24.0, Google Chrome. Both investigations found that Brave was, by far, the most private browser among those tested. Months later, an independent review was conducted by Douglas Leith of Trinity College Dublin. Last year I did a review of several popular desktop browsers, focusing exclusively on what they do when you launch the browser for the first time. The following review was conducted by Sampson, Senior Developer Relations Specialist at Brave.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |